Show Login

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?
  • CREATE_AN_ACCOUNT

Show Search

Friday 18 May

Главная News of the Center
Search Keyword: Total 4 results found.
Tag: C государственными структурами РФ Ordering
Альянс цивилизаций в восточном раю

В столице Катара, Дохе, с 9 по 13 декабря прошел Форум Альянса цивилизаций ООН. Я смог принять участие в Форуме благодаря поддержке российского благотворительного Фонда Горчакова, который взял на себя основную часть командировочных расходов. Раньше я никогда не слышал про Доху, но хорошо знал, что восток - дело тонкое, и не удивлялся, что до последнего момента у меня не было ни визы, ни программы Форума. На сайте Форума организаторы написали, что всю информацию мы получим в Дохе, в аэропорту. Там меня ждал первый сюрприз. Я сидел в хвостовой части авиалайнера и, когда открыли второй выход я, вместе с другими пассажирами, сел в автобус, и нас повезли в аэропорт. Там выяснилось, что я нахожусь в терминале для транзитных пассажиров. Я думал, что доехать до нужного терминала будет проблематично, но... первый же местный служащей посадил нас в автобус и отправил куда надо.

 

Наш выбор – ТОЛЕРАНТНОСТЬ. На «Байкале-2020»  мы построили Дорогу Дружбы
Декабрь. Холодно. Как правило, в это время вспоминается все хорошее, что было в уходящем году. У нас уже стало доброй традицией проводить мероприятия на берегу Байкала. В этом году команда Центра межнационального сотрудничества приняла участие в Молодежном форуме «Байкал-2020». Дорога от Москвы до Байкала на поезде заняла долгих 3,5 суток. Организаторы форума оплачивали все расходы, кроме транспортных. Поскольку в состав нашей команды входили трое студентов, мы решили поехать в Иркутск на поезде, в плацкартном вагоне. Даже такой билет в одну сторону стоил почти 5 тысяч рублей. Простая арифметика говорит, что нашим молодым людям выгоднее летом полететь на самолете в Турцию или Египет, чем путешествовать по России. А потом мы удивляемся, почему среди молодых москвичей так мало толерантных. Откуда им взяться, если молодые люди ни разу не были на Северном Кавказе, в Сибири или Карелии?
Актуальные проблемы НКО на заседании Общественной Палаты РФ

14 июля в 11.00 состоялось заседание Общественной Палаты РФ по наиболее актуальным вопросам для некоммерческих организаций, в том числе, как повысить эффективность НКО.

По словам организаторов, идея встречи зародилась на портале НКО, суть в том, что была необходима встреча для конструктивного диалога между ресурсными и консалтинговыми центрами и НКО. В идеале, НКО должны были говорить о своих проблемах, а ресурсные центры предлагать свою помощь в их решении.

Using the Potential of Student Youth for Prophylaxis of Extremism among Youth

In the guest house "Sunny Glade" from 24th - 25th October 2009 in the framework of the project "Utilizing the Network of Ethnic Associations in Russia to provide support for youth organizations in Russia" an educational seminar with the title "Using the potential of student youth for prophylaxis of extremism among youth" was carried out. A distinctive feature of this activity whose theme repeatedly covers other trainings of the Center for Interethnic Cooperation in different regions of our country was the target audience. For the first time official representatives of the students were invited to participate in this seminar. Assistant Vice-Chancellors on educational work, heads of active students associations of twenty leading universities in Moscow gathered for the first time to exchange opinions about the reasons for the increasingly alarming situation with the strengthening extremist ideology in the youth's minds.

Representatives of the General Prosecutor's Office and the Ministry of Internal Affairs responsible for countering youth extremism and extreme forms of manifestation of ethnic intolerance took part in the discussion. In addition representatives of the Federal Agency on Youth Affairs participated in the seminar and described the activities aimed at building tolerance in the Year of the Youth in Russia. The educational seminar was attended by students from the universities of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Nizhniy Novgorod, which happens often on our trainings, and also by Valence Maniragena, Deputy Dean on the work with foreign students of State Electro-Technical University of St. Petersburg, an international expert on questions of tolerance building. In total, 39 people took part in the training.

The process began with brainstorming which aim it was to answer the question how and why in a country that defeated fascism manifestations of extreme hostility against people of other nationalities appear. After creating an extended list and procedures of rating, the following answers remained:

The main reasons for youth extremism:

Propaganda of xenophobia in the mass-media Insufficient information on other cultures Lack of a precise policy of the State Cultural differences Problems in the family and poverty Loss of the system of values and ideals

It is obvious that each item on this list can be leveled with special social projects.

Then, according to the tradition, were created social portraits of the people who play a special role in the life of a youth, one of them was the student.

The typical student

Typical motives:

Hungry Wants to sleep and to drink Lazy (before the session) Very active (unwilling to serve in the army) Weak will, lack of strong interests Good work (money, relations, prestige) Ostentatious patriotism

Typical occupation

Doesn't study Games and social networks Tries to pass sessions Active leisure activities Search for freebie Side jobs

Such a poor-sympathetic image of the best representatives of our youth what should in principle be a student does not inspire with optimism. Nevertheless, the representatives of these students rated the portrait nearly with 4 on a five-point scale, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest point. That is, the portrait practically corresponds to the actual situation. It has to be said that the portraits of the young people, the teacher and the skinhead we received were even sadder.

Therefore, the emotional discussion extended then about how - having this social environment, the feeding of the youth with extremism and that typical student who can easily take a fancy in such ideas - to develop an active system of resistance against extremism within the youth. The ideas were as follows:

Concrete actions to build tolerance among youths:

Trainings on tolerance Informal meetings with representatives of the State - Ministry of Internal Affairs, Prosecutor's Office, Justice Weeks of ethnicities at the universities Hidden public service advertising (PSA) Parades and processions Flash-mobs

As a whole, understandable and expected suggestions. The impression is that behind all these items stands one: the call "Let's do something!"

Our request to formulate recommendations to the state authorities after some initial bewilderment ("Is somebody up there interested in my opinion??!!") caused much enthusiasm. And the participants of the seminar created a list of recommendations to all who are involved in the process of tolerance building within the state institutions.

Recommendations to the law enforcement bodies

Be a model: trainings for employees of the militia on migration problems and work with the youth - regularly Lessons on the legal culture and civic consciousness for pupils - building of a good reputation Informal meetings with representatives of student organizations Create a positive image of the workers of the law enforcement bodies Round tables for the discussion of actual problems in the universities Establish on all levels of the structures of the law enforcement bodies public councils on question of tolerance involving real social leaders and not only well-known media personalities Strengthen the control over the mass-media!!!

Recommendations to the rectors of universities

Abolish bureaucracy Facilitate feedback Give the go-ahead for support - and don't interfere Speak in front of the students about the significance of the problem Spend work with the academic council and teaching structures Work with schools Conduct a course on intercultural communication and ethno pedagogy Include in the budget of the university the work on prevention of extremism and tolerance augmentation Increase the popularity and significance of the topic - discussion in the academic council, on the meetings of the departments and in post-graduate courses Assign a responsible from the leadership of the universities Be the leader in your university!!! Meetings with students and the publicity

Recommendations to the Federal Agency on Youth Affairs of Russia

Give broadened information about your organization Establish relations with all universities and youth organizations Work constantly on the reputation of the organization Create a forum for the introduction of suggestions and the conducting of a discussion Work out and distribute university regulations and an activity plan of the Agency for the years 2009-2010

Recommendations to the government of Moscow

Announce the Year of Tolerance Create a permanent, effective council on problems of tolerance Create help points - consultation and adaptation Qualitative PSAs Development of a common tolerance policy with the aid of EXPERTS! Meetings with idols - models of tolerance Creation of a general program on prevention of extremism in the schools of Moscow Supervision of the Moscow City Council Meeting of representatives of the government with the youth Work with representatives of the mass-media (media culture)

The Center for Interethnic Cooperation sent these recommendations to the Government, the General Prosecutor's Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Agency on Youth Affairs of the RF and also the Government of Moscow and the rectors of the universities from which representatives took part in the seminar.

In conclusion, I want to give the data of a survey we conducted during this seminar. As a rule, on our educational seminars we ask the participants to rate the level of tolerance in the given region. Moscow always receives the lowest rates, regardless of the interrogated social group, the topic of the training and the composition of the participants. This time, according to the results of all votes, Moscow was awarded only 2.5 points out of 5. It seems that this is a very alarming result for the capital of our multinational country. But there is reason for optimism. Without exception all participants answered on the question "Do you further want to work on topics of tolerance?" with "YES". And especially pleasing for the Center for Interethnic Cooperation is that we received this answer also on the question "Do you want this seminar to be held at your university?"